Saturday, March 5, 2011

Does Semen Smell Like Squid

And Islam certainly belonged to Germany!



Is Islam but to Germany or not. Our BuPrä know, says YES. Our new interior minister, in contrast, does not he belongs to Germany.

any case it is extremely entertaining, keep track of who says that Islam does not belong to Germany, and who thinks he nevertheless forms part of Germany.

So, our President said, is well known in his inaugural address that Islam belongs to Germany.

The current interior minister, at that time Chairman of the National Association of the CSU, disagreed with the immediately. In an interview after he took office Friedrich contradicted the BuPrä again.

woman Merkel and Steffen Seibert: Islam belonged to Germany.

woman Künast : Islam has yet to Germany.

woman Leutheuser-Schnarrenberger : Islam is "obviously" but with Germany.

And what I say? Islam - see movie - even heard of Erich Honecker. The GDR. The fighting forces of the working class, 25 Anniversary of the construction of the anti-fascist protective wall to celebrate. For what part of fighting forces of the working class in front of them? What rings and bammelt there with the same pace?

Schell A tree! Ha! Em is the English part "turkish crescent," and from there, namely Chapels of the Janissaries of the Ottoman Empire comes this musical instrument also produces. The old Prussia was well aware, and so was it appropriately enough, the last Schellenbaum institution of the First World War, the defunct First Regiment of Foot Guards a true Muslim: the honorable Vice-sergeant Ben Aissa. (be careful who gets to loud military music hearing, turn down the first rule)

Who but the Janissaries, originally yes (boy reading) were stolen from Christian families, considers to be "fanatical Muslims" as the good Wikipedia is wound pretty wrong. Even the life of the Janissaries, which indeed a military order were celibate soldiers are not exactly the Muslim ideal. Instead, the Ottoman Empire deliberately oriented to the military orders of Christendom. And Haji Bektash, the founder of the Bektashi Order, which gave the Janissaries, the spiritual orientation was not deeply religious Muslim.

The mystical order of the Bektashi can rather only with difficulty, the associate Islam. The famous students Haji Bektash, Shams-e Tabrizi and his student Jalal ad-Din ar Rumi , especially the latter saw themselves not as Muslims themselves, Rumi has become rather dissociates himself from Islam, his grave was and is used by Jews, Christians and Muslims worship. Haji Betasch is the Turkish Alevis as a religious founder. So rather

is the religion of the Alevi-Bektashi to Germany, at least for the German military music? Or? No, all Nonsens.Es is only useful if it thins the religious freedom, "Freedom of worship" . So how have the * beep * liberal always wanted. For cafeteria Catholics Wulff this nonsense sentence therefore makes as much sense as the militant Catholics eater Leutheuser-Schnarrenberger. Speaking Alevite n:
hear from the Home Office is, Alevis are the only ones that are working smoothly flap. "Do me a favor: Stay here and get some more of your people to" flapste SPD chief Sigmar Gabriel recently Alevi on New Year's reception. "You are now better integrated than the Catholic Church," For this he earned applause from Greens leader Claudia Roth and a smile of Bundestag President Norbert Lammert (CDU). What we
learn from this? In Turkey the Alevis are an oppressed religious minority. Religious minorities, the impunity allowed to make any jokes that every bully with impunity to harass, defame and insult can there is no means only in Turkey. And that the * beep * liberal Catholics to have "smile" in Germany has even tradition.

Does Semen Smell Like Squid

And Islam certainly belonged to Germany!



Is Islam but to Germany or not. Our BuPrä know, says YES. Our new interior minister, in contrast, does not he belongs to Germany.

any case it is extremely entertaining, keep track of who says that Islam does not belong to Germany, and who thinks he nevertheless forms part of Germany.

So, our President said, is well known in his inaugural address that Islam belongs to Germany.

The current interior minister, at that time Chairman of the National Association of the CSU, disagreed with the immediately. In an interview after he took office Friedrich contradicted the BuPrä again.

woman Merkel and Steffen Seibert: Islam belonged to Germany.

woman Künast : Islam has yet to Germany.

woman Leutheuser-Schnarrenberger : Islam is "obviously" but with Germany.

And what I say? Islam - see movie - even heard of Erich Honecker. The GDR. The fighting forces of the working class, 25 Anniversary of the construction of the anti-fascist protective wall to celebrate. For what part of fighting forces of the working class in front of them? What rings and bammelt there with the same pace?

Schell A tree! Ha! Em is the English part "turkish crescent," and from there, namely Chapels of the Janissaries of the Ottoman Empire comes this musical instrument also produces. The old Prussia was well aware, and so was it appropriately enough, the last Schellenbaum institution of the First World War, the defunct First Regiment of Foot Guards a true Muslim: the honorable Vice-sergeant Ben Aissa. (be careful who gets to loud military music hearing, turn down the first rule)

Who but the Janissaries, originally yes (boy reading) were stolen from Christian families, considers to be "fanatical Muslims" as the good Wikipedia is wound pretty wrong. Even the life of the Janissaries, which indeed a military order were celibate soldiers are not exactly the Muslim ideal. Instead, the Ottoman Empire deliberately oriented to the military orders of Christendom. And Haji Bektash, the founder of the Bektashi Order, which gave the Janissaries, the spiritual orientation was not deeply religious Muslim.

The mystical order of the Bektashi can rather only with difficulty, the associate Islam. The famous students Haji Bektash, Shams-e Tabrizi and his student Jalal ad-Din ar Rumi , especially the latter saw themselves not as Muslims themselves, Rumi has become rather dissociates himself from Islam, his grave was and is used by Jews, Christians and Muslims worship. Haji Betasch is the Turkish Alevis as a religious founder. So rather

is the religion of the Alevi-Bektashi to Germany, at least for the German military music? Or? No, all Nonsens.Es is only useful if it thins the religious freedom, "Freedom of worship" . So how have the * beep * liberal always wanted. For cafeteria Catholics Wulff this nonsense sentence therefore makes as much sense as the militant Catholics eater Leutheuser-Schnarrenberger. Speaking Alevite n:
hear from the Home Office is, Alevis are the only ones that are working smoothly flap. "Do me a favor: Stay here and get some more of your people to" flapste SPD chief Sigmar Gabriel recently Alevi on New Year's reception. "You are now better integrated than the Catholic Church," For this he earned applause from Greens leader Claudia Roth and a smile of Bundestag President Norbert Lammert (CDU). What we
learn from this? In Turkey the Alevis are an oppressed religious minority. Religious minorities, the impunity allowed to make any jokes that every bully with impunity to harass, defame and insult can there is no means only in Turkey. And that the * beep * liberal Catholics to have "smile" in Germany has even tradition.

Tuesday, March 1, 2011

Low Cost Dental Clinics In Tampa Florida

This day will still be remembered

not only because of the resignation of Defence Minister Guttenberg. Most importantly, we are left in memory because the European Court of Justice has undertaken with explicit reference to the Lisbon Treaty and the Charter of Fundamental Rights adopted there as well, relying on the Equal Treatment Directive of the EU The insurers offer so-called unisex rates. Both events have to do the rest together. They are of the same school of jurists have been prepared and executed.

The verdict is not interested? Room. I know some lawyers who are inclined, under the impact of this ruling cast their habit. Or to emigrate. Or both. And also their fellow citizens to emigrate Tue belong hiermit.Ich I recommend it. And what this decision affects us, I will explain in more detail. The ruling means the final entry in a company which I have already referred to on this blog more often than neo-feudal. A company the chances are not on his talent and fitness awards, but according to personal characteristics, just "like" a feudal society. Seemingly without regard to the person but that is why, in respect of the person.

On first glance, it is purely a question of insurance law. Can insurance companies in insurance rates by gender differentiation? Now, for example, a pension for women more expensive. The reason is simple. Women live longer. You get no less for their money when they pay higher premiums, but as much as men who pay less but get less for it, namely, lower pensions for a shorter lifetime.

This result is not merely an actuarial mandatory, but the traditional constitutional doctrine, even necessary. Because the principle of equality of classical constitutions prohibits not only unequal treatment same facts but also the equal treatment of different situations. Unisex rates are around for a pension according to the classical understanding of "equality before the law" illegal because they are too expensive for men and for women too cheap. Men get in this tariff less for their money - because they live shorter - than women.

But the EU approach prohibits "discrimination" in the literal translation distinction. It may no longer be distinguished, because the distinction - a discrimination pleonastic.

What does this mean for the other case law can be guessed. The Charter of Fundamental Rights which prohibits inter alia discrimination on the basis of "sexual orientation". With a ruling that the adoption rights granted lesbigay couples who not only civil, but possibly also religious marriage for homosexuals commands, is to be expected.

is because in that case also raised yet another paradigm shift. The Charter of Fundamental Rights is not about negative rights against state interference is obliged not primarily the state, but rather requires each individual citizen, every society, every institution. It would be only logical, forthcoming marriage sue for gay couples before the age of a Catholic church. In England, where Catholic teaching posts has offered to mediate and gay adoption children, where the Anglican state church should be obliged to offer in their churches wedding rituals for gays and lesbians, it's been so far.

We are now therefore on the threshold of a new age. There will be no less totalitarian than other periods of history.

Low Cost Dental Clinics In Tampa Florida

This day will still be remembered

not only because of the resignation of Defence Minister Guttenberg. Most importantly, we are left in memory because the European Court of Justice has undertaken with explicit reference to the Lisbon Treaty and the Charter of Fundamental Rights adopted there as well, relying on the Equal Treatment Directive of the EU The insurers offer so-called unisex rates. Both events have to do the rest together. They are of the same school of jurists have been prepared and executed.

The verdict is not interested? Room. I know some lawyers who are inclined, under the impact of this ruling cast their habit. Or to emigrate. Or both. And also their fellow citizens to emigrate Tue belong hiermit.Ich I recommend it. And what this decision affects us, I will explain in more detail. The ruling means the final entry in a company which I have already referred to on this blog more often than neo-feudal. A company the chances are not on his talent and fitness awards, but according to personal characteristics, just "like" a feudal society. Seemingly without regard to the person but that is why, in respect of the person.

On first glance, it is purely a question of insurance law. Can insurance companies in insurance rates by gender differentiation? Now, for example, a pension for women more expensive. The reason is simple. Women live longer. You get no less for their money when they pay higher premiums, but as much as men who pay less but get less for it, namely, lower pensions for a shorter lifetime.

This result is not merely an actuarial mandatory, but the traditional constitutional doctrine, even necessary. Because the principle of equality of classical constitutions prohibits not only unequal treatment same facts but also the equal treatment of different situations. Unisex rates are around for a pension according to the classical understanding of "equality before the law" illegal because they are too expensive for men and for women too cheap. Men get in this tariff less for their money - because they live shorter - than women.

But the EU approach prohibits "discrimination" in the literal translation distinction. It may no longer be distinguished, because the distinction - a discrimination pleonastic.

What does this mean for the other case law can be guessed. The Charter of Fundamental Rights which prohibits inter alia discrimination on the basis of "sexual orientation". With a ruling that the adoption rights granted lesbigay couples who not only civil, but possibly also religious marriage for homosexuals commands, is to be expected.

is because in that case also raised yet another paradigm shift. The Charter of Fundamental Rights is not about negative rights against state interference is obliged not primarily the state, but rather requires each individual citizen, every society, every institution. It would be only logical, forthcoming marriage sue for gay couples before the age of a Catholic church. In England, where Catholic teaching posts has offered to mediate and gay adoption children, where the Anglican state church should be obliged to offer in their churches wedding rituals for gays and lesbians, it's been so far.

We are now therefore on the threshold of a new age. There will be no less totalitarian than other periods of history.