is the key word: freedom. Anyone looking for the homepage of the authors of the memorandum Church in 2011, will find it under memorandum-freiheit.de . The brief text contains thirteen times the word "free" or "freedom" in various compositions and hues, three of the six propositions have the topic of "liberation" - in much of the "patronizing" church. Protestant phraseology, which is usually seen with Protestants far more critical than with progressive Catholics.
"Church of Freedom" was called by the President of the EKD Huber a thesis paper, which spread a band of Protestant officials in 2006. Church of Freedom - Intelligent shrink (! * Just *) is a interview overwritten, which is found today on the side of the EKD. And in this interview, Huber will be the Social Democrat must hold that they "dare more freedom" slogan but I already heard from one of the better-known German Social Democrats. Recyling everywhere then. The Evangelical recycle political slogans, the progressive evangelical Catholicism slogans.
What you want to free themselves is hardly overlook: from the paternalistic church. So all over again, Reformation, this time from within, or more precisely from the inside up, still more specifically from the pulpit of hochgelahrten Doctorii and Professorii down, education starting from the self-imposed immaturity, democratization of the church a la francaise, not to forget the sexual revolution in the style of Sartre, Beauvoir, Reich, community 2 and Judith Butler.
grabs me as even some despair when I see that as well appointed officials with W3 swing up the Revo-old flag, which I myself have swung again - what has me the W3 messed up but pretty. Yes, I was one of the cultural superiority of Protestantism deeply committed young man, left radical Jacobins, once ran around with two huge hoop earrings, Saint-Just because I was so mad, and when I was Sexpol movement forward to it. Simone de Beauvoir was I just had to find good, because otherwise I find any chance a darling treasure, would be completely blocked. And all this Freud-Fromm-Reich-psycho-trash of the 60s I've eaten until it came out my ears. sign
Now that now (alone?) 205 university teachers (and rising), a manifesto that is a crude Sammmelsurium neoprotestantischer, "enlightened" Jacobin, sexual reformist ideas that recover the Catholic Church should. That the "liberation" from the "Roman paternalism" in the history usually ended in the subjugation of the Church under the power of the state probably will not take note. And that the "sexual liberation" as the "liberation of women" in the truest sense of the word brutal new form of sexual slavery ended, either.
How well is generally overlooked that one could sail with fluttering flags of freedom in a new dictatorship, but not that of the absolutist prince or the sans-culottes, but at least in the journalistic triumvirate BahnersDeckersPrantl.
This applies more broadly, the typical Protestant "necessary risers. The signatories are not even deny that they practice a kind of Protestantization the church. But with so many call them is hardly clear that they belong to the Protestant Bootstrapping. This applies, for example "action area" (oh this hollow tinny droning teacher jargon) 6:
The service must not freeze in traditionalism. Cultural diversity enriches the worship life and is not consistent with tendencies of centralized standardization.The Lutheran (selbstverfreilich also the ex-Lutheran), the source of the highest known. Article 28 of the Augsburg Confession denies yes not only the temporal power of bishops, but also their right to build within the church statutes, not least to adopt liturgical rules. The "Liturgy of freedom" was the Lutherans and Catholics is the progressive integral part of the "Romfreiheit" or to use the words of Carl Schmitt, the anti-Roman emotion.
The sense of freedom of Protestantism - so far he does not see itself as a liberation from the Roman "centralism" - it is otherwise not well. Protestants, this is most clearly aware than Luther Protestantization Catholic sympathizers.
fell on my last visit to the erstwhile archbishop's cathedral in Lund Scandinavia me a brochure in the hands not only the History of the cathedral, but also the history of the Reformation in Scandinavia describes. The Reformation - it is there - in Scandinavia have the character of a coup d'etat (coup d'etat ") was adopted. The result was - as the Swedish Lutheran knowledge - the first totalitarian state in Europe.
"By today's standards, Swe society of the 17th and 18th centuries would be considered totalitarian Generally, Lutheran orthodoxy and strict church discipline were mainstays of systematic public control, to the church endorsed the Crown's claim to power."The only spiritual liberation from the Roman "centralism" ended - remember - in the Protestant authoritarianism - later softened by the friendly Regiment enlightened prince - totaly the whole European North.
Worse, however, the hachsodemokratische other so much - including workers from the trio infernal decker geyer - praised the direct election of bishops and priests.
As the old legal principle, "What concerns all should be decided by all" it takes more synodal structures at all levels of the church. The faithful are to participate in the appointment of important officials to (bishop, priest). What can be decided locally, will be decided there.It had once been and is no more. In the early centuries, the bishops in fact elected by the church people. Augustine obtained his unpopular office in this way. But the Roman centralism makes sense. He was sorely needed to combat the political influence on the composition of the Episcopal office. For centuries and until today the Church is fighting for that right. It was taken from her by many a medieval potentate, King of England, of the Prussian Cultural fighters of the Communist dictatorship in China. What
as democratic as it comes along similar to demonize the constitutional civil you Clerge of the French Republic of 1790. The bishops were approximately in accordance with this constitution by voters' meetings at departmental level by priests and laity (including the Protestant laity!) selected. Any influence of the Pope was off. The priests had to make an oath to the (anti-Catholic) Constitution of the Republic. About half of all clergy and the majority of the bishops did not sign. They were forbidden as "Eidverweigerer 'first public sermon, after they were arrested, expelled, was murdered. In the September massacres of 1792 were 200 "Réfractaires" slaughtered by a bloodthirsty mob. The democratization of the church ends in a bloodbath and, finally, the de-Christianization of France.
I think not that the church seems historically and canonically rather inexperienced professors have thought about this, in which tradition they were raised. But in my mind's eye a certain young man appears with two huge earrings, when I read this paper.
The picture shows an "underground church" of a prêtre austenitics
0 comments:
Post a Comment