Resume At Clothes Store

The F-word

worrying about what Christ well for, say, say Tobin tax would be a popular sport in the Geissler's our day. But the result is predictable. Of course Christ would say exactly what ATTAC member Geissler said, he would say.

I am surprised that hardly anyone asks what Paul would say, especially what he would say to those who rely explicitly on him. As the Memokatholiken . For the word of the "freedom message of the Gospel" takes Finally, an explicit reference to Gal. 5.1. In the text of Paul's statement that is to memo-F-1 For the

freedom Christ has set us free. Stand therefore, and do not charge again by a yoke of slavery! 2 Behold, I Paul say unto you, that Christ will profit you nothing if you let circumcised. 3 I testify again to every man that is circumcised, that he is to do the whole law guilty. 4 Ye are of Christ abgetrennt1 which you want to be justified by the law, ye are fallen from grace. ...

13 For you were called to freedom, brothers. Not only used the freedom as an opportunity for the flesh, but through love serve one another! 14 For the whole law is fulfilled in one word, in him, "You shall love your neighbor as yourself" 15 But if ye bite and devour one another, take heed that ye be not consumed one another! 16 I say then, Walk in the Spirit, and ye shall not fulfill the lust of the flesh. 17 For the flesh desires against the Spirit, the Spirit against the flesh, for these are opposed to each other, so you do not do what you want. 18 If you will but led by the Spirit, ye are not under the law. 19 It appears that the works of the flesh, they are: fornication, uncleanness, lewdness, 20 idolatry, sorcery, Enmities, strife, jealousy, anger outbursts, Selbstsüchteleien, dissensions, factions, 21 envy shops, drinking, gluttony and the like. Of these, I tell you in advance, as I said before, that those who do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God. ...

that Paul does not speak of freedom in the modern sense, is familiar to all exegetes. The freedom of the Gospel is no more and no less than freedom from the law of circumcision. The Memofreiheit has this - freedom to do absolutely nothing of the Gospel - Paul's. The Memofreiheit means the freedom of "Roman tutelage" (action 1 (though I can be difficult in these Theologenschraubsprech used)), of priestly Autoriät (HF2), the legal authority of the Church (HF3), of the moral authority of the church in the area of human sexuality (divorce, homosexuality, "sexual liberation" HF4) of "rigorous standards" (HF5) , from the "traditional" liturgy (HF6).

A Catholic Church that is without a pope, no priest, no right, no morals, no sinners, no liturgy. The audacity to invoke such a program on Paul, you can not really describe with a good, old, untranslatable Yiddish word chutzpah.

Thus, the freedom of the Gospel to the F-word.

I did not know that the LKA Nordrhein Westfalen times of Michael Hesemann was commissioned to produce a composite sketch of Paul. The crime was obviously very hard working and professional. Get the earliest pictorial representations and reports of eye witnesses who were available. One could imagine with this image Paul at the press conference of the Apostolic Episcopal Conference of the Munster heresies. Whether he would have written a letter to the Munster?